For Diversity Guidelines we follow CLICK HERE |
In conversations about the topic of dogs you find many different perspectives on the subject. A belief system in the minds of each individual that has their own strong views, they are the champion of their chosen ideology. And those ideologies can be very similar and open minded or extremely hardline and opposite from our own. In an attempt to simplify this into a visual metaphor I will use the term Moral Compass. Its an easy yet simple way to review just where we stand based on our own ideologies. And a moral compass allows us to review just where a breeder stands in the midst of controversy. Actually providing a measure that allows each person to reflect where they stand on a subject and put into perspective before they fire bullets without a cause. Or without understanding where others are coming from. Its possible that from understanding these differences it would lead to less contempt and hatred between these ideological factions.
Lets look at a simple Moral Compass. The one pictured below shows an evenly balanced individual with no tendency to favor any of the extremes from the categories that sit around the circle of ideologies
The Balanced Breeder; The Moral Compass above shows a balance between The Trophy minded Dog Show and trial driven segment of the dog world in relation to the Extremist Rescue minded activists, the Purely profit driven Back Yard Breeders or Commercial Breeders and Advocates for better long term health of their dogs. Depending on where you place the circle of ideology you can easily see where the underlying Morals are for each individual group. A balance between all the extremes leaves an equal amount of concern for each category and therefore a balanced Moral compass. This is what a breeder should strive for. This is what Chatham Hill strives for. However, after the jump you'll see the Moral Compass that reflects what we've had to deal with for the time we've tried to find that balance.
When we first started out in the pure bred fancy and actually went to dog shows we were just stunned at all the different breeds. The fascinating differences and the almost religious practices that the breeders participated in prior to any showing. It was at times very amusing and at others very concerning to witness. Primping and preening their dogs to prance around in a show ring. Making every effort to keep the onlookers away from their champion dogs for fear of contaminating them with germs from the curious public.
- I'll add the AKC Dog registry to the above as Morally balanced. You see, the AKC doesn't set the standards that can prove detrimental to many of our pure breed dogs its the breed clubs that submit these standards to the registry. The AKC then becomes a central repository for the lineage history of the breed clubs that join them. And although the AKC can follow the guidelines set in place by the breed clubs... they are powerless to enforce reform without losing the support and funding of the breed clubs themselves. So the main registry is kind of stuck in the middle. And the result is the practices that put our dogs in such a sparse genetic situation in the first place continue. Fortunately the public awareness has forced the moral compass of many breed clubs to try and clean up their image. But, if you consider where the situation is for many breeds.... the awareness may have come too late.